Croydon MET have developed the new DIY SWAT team.
Who will come round at a moments notice to inspect any new work you are doing to your front door step. (BUT ONLY IF YOU ARE WHITE THAT IS?.)
Who will come round at a moments notice to inspect any new work you are doing to your front door step. (BUT ONLY IF YOU ARE WHITE THAT IS?.)
NOT MET POLICE . . . . . A totally unofficial web page on www.metpolicecroydon.info that tells the truth about policing in CROYDON
Dear M’am Re case no 3838256/03 . . 243 Portland Rd SE25
On reflection overnight the more I think about the way the police are behaving the more incensed I am getting about it..
I heard the most bizarre twist to this sorry saga today. I must emphasize it is only hearsay, but I have no reason to doubt it’s validity. I was told today by one of my new tenants, of this.
Last Monday a week ago I had to drill two ½” holes in my step, (again entirely on my own property), to make way for the safety barrier I intended to erect. The sort of holes you would drill to put a shelf up. But as the floor is made of quarry tiles this actually took about two hours with a break to get a new drill bit.
Sometime after I left FIVE policemen, actually four and a policewoman turned up in a squad cars and examined the holes. Then banged on our door till my tenant came out, and demanded to see me. Then milled around for a while, mumbling and complaining and went away.
Now am I the only one to see the discrepancy here? I come into Norwood Police station with a whole host of very serious complaints three months ago, with evidence, including one of actual physical damage that can plainly be seen right above our front door to this day. (well I think they are serious, and so did PC Reen, but evidently the rest of your officers did not) And all I get is . . . “We shall therefore, be taking no further action with regard to your allegation(s).”
Yet when I drill two tiny holes in my own front doorstep, FIVE police have the time to utilize squad cars to come and examine them.
Obviously finding this activity very serious indeed.
So . . why didn’t they find time to question her about the nailing of her sign to MY FRONT DOOR? It’s STILL THERE even though I complained about it three months ago. Monday, 15 December 2003 to Sector Inspector Ian Barry “And now Sir further material evidence. These people have had the temerity to paint a Caribbean scene above my doorway . . DEFACING MY PROPERTY. Entirely without permission and of course against my wishes.
The plan of the property demised I sent you clearly shows which is our own. . . This is not part of the bona fide shop sign at all. . . . it is on my property.
May I please ask how my complaint is progressing? My patience with these people is wearing pretty thin.
I do hope I am not going to be told that because I am white I do not qualify for the same protection as these people would expect.”
Why didn’t they find the time to mention about her behavior while they were there?. I’ve been complaining about it long enough? . . Wednesday, 03 December 2003 . . to Sector Inspector Ian Barry “And couldn’t someone have a word with her about threatening behaviour? . . or her accusations to all and sundry . . including to me in writing of racial hatred?”
Why didn’t they find time to talk to her about her trespassing on my property? I’ve been complaining about it long enough. Friday, 05 December 2003 to Sector Inspector Ian Barry . . “I can tell you now that if that shop ever does open for business I will not allow the tenant, or her customers access over my property. I will if necessary physically prevent it. And I would expect your good-selves to protect my right to do so. Unless and until they can provide some evidence on paper that they have the right to do so.
Would it be too much to ask if an officer of yours could ask them if they have any such evidence? And tell them their position if they do not? And even tell them that if they do not, they are trespassing?”
What worries me is this. If FIVE Police officers are going to come out over two such small holes, what are the police going to send when I dig 1/2 a ton of rubble out of it shortly?
I emphasize again this is only as told to me. But you would be able to check its validity I’m sure. And if it is true? Would you please inform your officers that I don’t live at that address, and if they want me my mobile is always on.
On reflection overnight the more I think about the way the police are behaving the more incensed I am getting about it..
I heard the most bizarre twist to this sorry saga today. I must emphasize it is only hearsay, but I have no reason to doubt it’s validity. I was told today by one of my new tenants, of this.
Last Monday a week ago I had to drill two ½” holes in my step, (again entirely on my own property), to make way for the safety barrier I intended to erect. The sort of holes you would drill to put a shelf up. But as the floor is made of quarry tiles this actually took about two hours with a break to get a new drill bit.
Sometime after I left FIVE policemen, actually four and a policewoman turned up in a squad cars and examined the holes. Then banged on our door till my tenant came out, and demanded to see me. Then milled around for a while, mumbling and complaining and went away.
Now am I the only one to see the discrepancy here? I come into Norwood Police station with a whole host of very serious complaints three months ago, with evidence, including one of actual physical damage that can plainly be seen right above our front door to this day. (well I think they are serious, and so did PC Reen, but evidently the rest of your officers did not) And all I get is . . . “We shall therefore, be taking no further action with regard to your allegation(s).”
Yet when I drill two tiny holes in my own front doorstep, FIVE police have the time to utilize squad cars to come and examine them.
Obviously finding this activity very serious indeed.
So . . why didn’t they find time to question her about the nailing of her sign to MY FRONT DOOR? It’s STILL THERE even though I complained about it three months ago. Monday, 15 December 2003 to Sector Inspector Ian Barry “And now Sir further material evidence. These people have had the temerity to paint a Caribbean scene above my doorway . . DEFACING MY PROPERTY. Entirely without permission and of course against my wishes.
The plan of the property demised I sent you clearly shows which is our own. . . This is not part of the bona fide shop sign at all. . . . it is on my property.
May I please ask how my complaint is progressing? My patience with these people is wearing pretty thin.
I do hope I am not going to be told that because I am white I do not qualify for the same protection as these people would expect.”
Why didn’t they find the time to mention about her behavior while they were there?. I’ve been complaining about it long enough? . . Wednesday, 03 December 2003 . . to Sector Inspector Ian Barry “And couldn’t someone have a word with her about threatening behaviour? . . or her accusations to all and sundry . . including to me in writing of racial hatred?”
Why didn’t they find time to talk to her about her trespassing on my property? I’ve been complaining about it long enough. Friday, 05 December 2003 to Sector Inspector Ian Barry . . “I can tell you now that if that shop ever does open for business I will not allow the tenant, or her customers access over my property. I will if necessary physically prevent it. And I would expect your good-
What worries me is this. If FIVE Police officers are going to come out over two such small holes, what are the police going to send when I dig 1/2 a ton of rubble out of it shortly?
I emphasize again this is only as told to me. But you would be able to check its validity I’m sure. And if it is true? Would you please inform your officers that I don’t live at that address, and if they want me my mobile is always on.
Lets also reflect on this. I go away on holiday mid December in the secure knowledge that at last something was going to be done about these people, according to PC Reen. (or so I thought) When I return I find my case has been handed to some other department who then hand it to a trainee, who doesn’t bother to read the file, and even gets the person I’m complaining about wrong, Patel the freeholder, instead of Dyer the tenant. It then sits on someone’s desk for two months even though I made many inquiries. After many phone calls emails and letters that are completely ignored I write to you (well your boss) and it is only after this that someone bothers to contact me.
And when they do, all I get is . . . “We shall therefore, be taking no further action with regard to your allegation(s).”
When I ask for clarification I am again ignored. I complain, (well only point it out at this stage), about police exceeding their authority, and I am again ignored.
The one time I am contacted is by Ken Connor, and I am delighted, until I realise he is investigating a complaint from Lister & Wood about my advertising campaign, which they thoroughly deserved. Enough for the Law Society to investigate on my behalf anyway. Case no 34859-2004/MP.
Yet I drill two tiny holes in my own doorstep, and a SWAT team arrives.
Is there some other agenda that I don’t know about?
Has ANYTHING been done about all this at all? I still don’t understand why the police don’t want to investigate my complaints. But I understand even less why they are being so clearly biased now. The least I should be able to expect from the police is evenhandedness, and to uphold the law. Which entering my property without a warrant and ordering me about, for no infraction of the law whatsoever, clearly is not.
Yours most sincerely . . Colin Cole
There was no reply to this letter. . . . .
I HAVE NEVER RECEIVED AN APOLOGY WHICH IS WHY I NOW OWN THREE WEB-SITES ABOUT THE METROPOLITAN POLICE
When I ask for clarification I am again ignored. I complain, (well only point it out at this stage), about police exceeding their authority, and I am again ignored.
The one time I am contacted is by Ken Connor, and I am delighted, until I realise he is investigating a complaint from Lister & Wood about my advertising campaign, which they thoroughly deserved. Enough for the Law Society to investigate on my behalf anyway. Case no 34859-
Yet I drill two tiny holes in my own doorstep, and a SWAT team arrives.
Is there some other agenda that I don’t know about?
Has ANYTHING been done about all this at all? I still don’t understand why the police don’t want to investigate my complaints. But I understand even less why they are being so clearly biased now. The least I should be able to expect from the police is evenhandedness, and to uphold the law. Which entering my property without a warrant and ordering me about, for no infraction of the law whatsoever, clearly is not.
Yours most sincerely . . Colin Cole
There was no reply to this letter. . . . .
I HAVE NEVER RECEIVED AN APOLOGY WHICH IS WHY I NOW OWN THREE WEB-
Disclaimer . . I don’t know how Croydon MET Police treat other people but this is how they have treated me. Everything is true with letters to back it up.
The sarcastic notes are based on those truths and are not meant to imply the Metpolice always act that way.
“CAREFUL LADS
That’s a 9mm
Black & Decker he’s got in there.”
That’s a 9mm
Black & Decker he’s got in there.”
TWAT TEAM of 5 turn up to examine two 9mm holes in my doorstep. But Mark Stockford Crime Manager Croydon Police says “this is not a ‘matter’ for the Police”. . . . REALLY???
Well not when it suits him it isn’t.
Well not when it suits him it isn’t.
The following letter is shown in its entirety as written but never replied to
CROYDON SWAT TEAM to be renamed TWAT TEAM.
Visit Local Government Ombudsman Watch , or L.G.O Watch the site that tells you the truth about this corrupt biased toothless lot who are supposed to oversee the Local Councils
Click here http://www.ombudsmanwatch.org/
Click here http://www.ombudsmanwatch.org/
This chap is doing the same to Moss & Coleman Solicitors www.mossandcoleman.co.uk
The Law Society’s Dirty Tricks Page.
In association with Richard “The Chair” Hegarty of Hegarty & Co Peterborough.
Consulting Matt Jacob of
Willoughby & Ptnrs London EC14
In association with Richard “The Chair” Hegarty of Hegarty & Co Peterborough.
Consulting Matt Jacob of
Willoughby & Ptnrs London EC14
CROYDON MET POLICE . . TWAT TEAM PAGE . .
999 EMERGENCY . . WATCH 5 OFFICERS RACE IN TWO SQUAD CARS TO SEE A HOLE IN THE GROUND.
(bottom of this page)
999 EMERGENCY . . WATCH 5 OFFICERS RACE IN TWO SQUAD CARS TO SEE A HOLE IN THE GROUND.
(bottom of this page)
On an MSN search of ‘met police croydon ‘. . . Colin’s sites go to No1 . . With a further 6 mentions in the first 30. Hhhmm! I’ll have to see what we can do about that.Click here
A search on ‘Sir Ian Blair’ finds Colin’s site site No2 . . Above the BBC, The Times,The Guardian and Independent
A search on ‘Sir Ian Blair’ finds Colin’s site site No2 . . Above the BBC, The Times,The Guardian and Independent
SEE WHAT SIR IAN BLAIR HAS TO SAY ABOUT THE DISGRACEFUL BEHAVIOUR OF HIS OFFICERS IN THE CROYDON MET POLICE.
CLICK HERE
Mr Cole
Monday, March 01, 2004
Sue Farley
Personal Assistant to Borough Commander Vicki Marr
Croydon Police Station
71 Park Lane
Croydon, Surrey, CR9 1BP
Personal Assistant to Borough Commander Vicki Marr
Croydon Police Station
71 Park Lane
Croydon, Surrey, CR9 1BP
On a Search on Metacrawler the engine that searches the rest.
A search of . . . met police croydon . . Oct 28 gave Colin’s sites an incredible 13 out of the first 20. . . . You can find their site No 39 on page 2
A search of . . . met police croydon . . Oct 28 gave Colin’s sites an incredible 13 out of the first 20. . . . You can find their site No 39 on page 2
Visit THE information Croydon site www.croydoncouncil.info
"for the removal of any doubt or confusion the author of these pages is married into a Jamaican family, has mixed race children and no racist inclinations whatsoever. The purpose of these pages is to point out the inadequacy of Police in enforcing racist legislation fairly, and according to the guidelines set out by the
Crime and Disorder Act 1998 Chapter 37 .and more particularly . . . the guidelines of the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) from http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/docs/racagoff.html
1.3 The Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) define a racial incident as:
"Any incident in which it appears to the reporting or investigating officer that the complaint involves an element of racial motivation; or any incident which includes an allegation of racial motivation made by any person."
(nb the word ANY)
(nb the word ANY)
1.5 ACPO have set out basic standards for recording racial incidents and individual forces have produced detailed step-by-step guidance. In particular, the ACPO Policy Principles for Dealing with Racial Incidents state:
"There should be a presumption towards prosecution in all racially motivated incidents and the effectiveness of police response enhanced by promoting increased prosecutions, where evidence allows, thus demonstrating to perpetrators that their actions will not be tolerated."
From http://www.redpepper.org.uk/natarch/xlawren3.html
Despite officers nationwide being issued with a booklet saying 'Don't forget, if anyone says it's a racial incident, it is!'
Despite officers nationwide being issued with a booklet saying 'Don't forget, if anyone says it's a racial incident, it is!'
ALL the above guidelines were totally ignored. . . . Not only that Croydon Police lost the evidence . . All four items properly and correctly entered into evidence along with my correctly sworn statements.
The point of these web sites is to point out that the same rules about racial hatred, racial threats, racial abuse, and even a racist gun threat . . that I had to suffer and endure. . . APPLY JUST AS MUCH TO THE BLACK CITIZENS AS THEY DO TO THE WHITES. And the Police are duty bound to abide by that and not just suit themselves.
Croydon Crime Manager Mark Stockford’s statement “This is not a matter for the Police” is not only UNTRUE but is UNLAWFUL.
Colin Cole
Croydon Ratepayers against Croydon Council
http://www.cracc.co.uk
http://www.cracc.co.uk
COLIN IS BACK . . . My sites have fallen by the wayside for a year while I was being sued unsuccessfully in the High Court of Justice . . . . Not for Defamation or Lible; because every word in them is true. . . but for Harassment under the 1997 Act. . . Trouble is . . One of MCP clients had to PERJURE himselves to do it. With the assistance of MCP Law of course who had no right to be in the sameCourtroom , according to the rules, let alone prosecuting. There will be a tale to tell of Conspiracy to Defraud. Theft, Fraud, Conspiracy to Perjure, and just about every malpractice a Solicitor and Barrister can manage. Please excuse the bad links you find. It’ll take months to restore these sites to their former No 1 in the World glory . . I’ll enjoy every minute of it. The main reason this site was reinstated is not to have a go at dear old Sir Ian . . . He’s got enough criticism out there without mine. It was because it became impossible to re-launch all my sites individually . . . . They are so intricately entwined.. BESIDES . . . It’s about time The Police started doing their JOB . . . ARRESTING CRIMINALS and PERJURERS and not making excuses NOT TO.
The Impropriety of
Sarah Adlam.
Click Here.
Let’s see you ignore this Law Society like you usually do.
SARAH (LIAR) ADLAM here . . . Deserves to be locked up (and might be yet) for what she did. Not only was she NOT ALLOWED to ACT in this matter. EVERYTHING she did was on behalf of herself and MCP LAW. . . . See the IMPROPRIETY of SARAH ADLAM and her pet barrister Matthew Hutchings. . . .Unlike Lisa Richardson below who was probably only doing what she was told . . . ADLAM must have sat down for hours planning skullduggery and PERJURY with her clients and Matthew Hutchings. . . and she wanted to charge ME £15,000 for it .
PARTNERS IN CRIME
The CROOKS at MCP Law
On Scotland Yards own NOT official web site
You want to catch a few criminals easy peasy Ian?
Here they are.
Colin’s NEW sites
Barnett Ross the no forms required to bid Auctioneers.
Contact Andrew
Mahon NI plaintiff 1’s chief fixer for details.
He knows Steven Grossman so doesn’t
have to fill out all those nasty Money Laundering forms.
Or ANY forms come to that.
www.barnett-
(Andrew Mahon specialises in gaining
entry to your property by pretending it is his,
3 Pettigo Rd, Kesh,
Co Fermanagh,
NI.
02868 632102
0775 665878)
Barnett Ross Auctioneers . . . No deposit necessary to
bid. We laugh at money laundering regulations.
But will the police investigate?
What a STAR .
HARRY ROFFEY
In his Seventies and having a go at the HSBC and Kent Police. His site is
www.corruptpolice
.co.uk/
He used to drive the BIG RED BUS. A really nice Guy until you upset him.
Bit like
me really.
See what I mean.
Click here