By Post Reporter
THE man responsible for introducing community support officers across the capital is to become the new head of Croydon Police. Mark Gore, 43, will be unveiled as the successor to borough commander Vicki Marr, who is retiring at the end of this month.
Chief Supt Gore oversaw the project to bring in Police Community Support Officers (PCSOs) to help tackle antisocial behaviour. Croydon was one of the first beneficiaries of the scheme.
The PCSOs have the power to issue penalty notices for offences such as littering and disorder, and can detain people for 30 minutes.
Chief Supt Gore will take over as Croydon's most senior police officer at a time when the borough has suffered a number of high-profile crimes, including the brutal murder of Sally Anne Bowman.
He said he was looking forward to continuing the "fantastic work" undertaken by Chief Supt Marr.
He added that one of his main goals would be to work with communities to tackle antisocial behaviour.
First of all congratulations.
I am particularly interested in the last two sentences underlined above. Does “continuing the fantastic work undertaken by Chief Supt Marr”. Include ignoring complaints? Invading the property of totally law abiding citizens. Wrongful threats of arrest? Ridiculous waste of police time and resources. (do a Google search . . . . . TWAT Team Croydon . . . . . and you’ll get the gist).
But worse than all that, her arrogance in failing to apologise. I have now had apologies from the Croydon Borough Commander of London Fire Brigade, Kevin Sexton. And now an apology from Croydon Council. Not I note from the arrogant waste of money David Wechsler CEO, it’s true. But it’s a start.
The article states you are going to tackle “antisocial behaviour”. I don’t suppose that includes investigating which Croydon Council Official passed and SIGNED OFF a scheme as fit knowing they were breaking planning laws, environmental health regulations, gas laws and everything else they had to put right. And how much of a BUNG encouraged him to do so.
How do I know? . . because despite being totally wrong and having to reverse their actions . . London Borough of Croydon will not enter into correspondence and deny it. Yes I am aware that the Local Government Ombudsman has made a ruling. (Croydon Council Guilty) But that only concerned the lack of response to the aforementioned. Not the subject of it. . . . I have yet to have any explanation whatsoever for LBC’s extraordinary (one would like to think) behaviour.
And I have had even less of an explanation for your predecessor’s behaviour (by proxy) either.
I assure I do not intend to let these matters rest until someone spends just a little Police time looking into the circumstances surrounding this ridiculous saga. Not of course the incompetent Mark Stockford who proved he didn’t know how to read, or at least understand a simple file. (and if you Google . . Mark Stockford crime manager . . . . you’ll get the gist of that too.)
Yours most sincerely Colin Cole.
ON THIS PAGE . . . Croydon Met Police to have a new Borough Commander. . . .Mark Gore . . . . who says he is going to carry on where Vicki Marr leaves off. . . I ask him if that includes ignoring complaints even when asked to investigate them by the IPCC?
Silly me . . . did I say . . search> Met Police Croydon . . No 2 on MSN ? . . . . .
I meant No 2 on Google, Virginnet, Ask Jeeves, MSN and No 1 on METACRAWLER . . . and front page on nearly every other engine. It seems my sites get as many visitors as theirs . . . and why not? . . . they are at least truthful.. . . . . there is only so much BSE (Bovine Solid Excrement) the public can stand.
Croydon Council GUILTY of Maladministration found by Ombudsman. Sept 2005 Click here
The Law Society’s incredible intervention, into spoof/parody sites is as noxious as the FA having a go at the News of the World for reporting a Football Player for snorting drugs. What The Law Society of England & Wales should do . . is exactly what the FA do . . . fine Solicitors who find themselves castigated on the web FOR BRINGING THE LAW PROFESSION INTO DISREPUTE . . . hang on a minute tho’ . . . . IS IT POSSIBLE TO BRING THE LAW MORE INTO DISREPUTE THAN THE LAW SOCIETY HAS DONE UP TO NOW? . . . . Click here
and for more fun go to The Law Society of England and Wales Dirty Tricks page. Click here.
Colin Clifford Cole. . . Contact me info@ingramwintergreen.co.uk
Tell me Mr Gore . . Would anti social behaviour be the incitement to racial hatred committed by Suryakant J Patel to Mrs Pauline Dyer about me. . . and admitted by her in Court in front of Judge Coningsby?
Could anti social behaviour include conspiring with your Solicitor to lie and deceive (in writing) in order to defraud. Not in the least rebutted by any of the accused (by me on the basis of that refusal to deny) as laid out in the oft made statement on ALL my web sites.
I am going to presume that Denniss Matthews Solicitors Anerley along with Ingram Winter Green Solicitors Bedford House and their clients Suryakant J Patel 2 Wickham Avenue Shirley and Fineland Properties Ltd, 43 Vincent Court (also known as Fine Land Properties Ltd. 2 Hillcrest Av. NW11 or Fineland Properties Ltd C/O Messrs Elliot Woolfe & Ros, Equity Hse, Edgeware ) . . . Reg owners Ruth Teitelbaum, 28 Overlea Road London, E5 9BG and Nathan Teitlebaum, Crest House, 34 Hillcrest Avenue, London NW11 0EN, CONSPIRED to lie, deceive and defraud me of my considerable claims in the matter of this dispute.
Or does anti social behaviour for you mean telling kids off for kicking beer cans . . . . the police often will tell us . . and I know this myself . . . that they can’t really investigate a crime because the vandals are long gone and there is no evidence. . . . Well here are a number of CRIMES . . With the EVIDENCE . . . . and all you got to do is INVESTIGATE THEM. . . .
NO? . . . . . Perhaps chasing kids and beer cans is a lot easier eh? . . Investigating Solicitors and their Clients is a bit chancy isn’t it you might get a threatening letter. . . or meet them down the Lodge.
What you can be sure of is that my sites will be here for a long time to come until you do INVESTIGATE. That is what we pay you for after all. . . Not to pick and choose what you want to look into.
Lets be clear . . Mark Stockford’s botch of a probe into my complaints was based on another persons opinion made before I was proved right in Crown Court. It was made before Croydon Council were found Guilty. . . It had no basis on any work that he Mark Stockford did himself . . . otherwise he would have been able to tell WHO IT WAS I COMPLAINED ABOUT from the file.
Well lets see shall we? . . . Just what a difference your appointment is going to make. Of course I could be surprised . . . But I won’t hold my breath. I’ve had my apology for 2004, and one in 2005,. So I suppose two in a year would be too much to ask for.
. . . Colin Cole
YOU WANT TO TRESPASS ON SOMEONE ELSE’S PROPERTY IN CROYDON? . . DIAL 999 . . AND THE MET POLICE CROYDON WILL SEND A SQUAD CAR AND HELP YOU DO IT . . ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS SAY IT’S YOURS . . NO PROOF NECESSARY.
( if you are black that is . . don’t bother if you are white)


Police are not serving us as we would wish
Oct 7 2005
I attended the meeting of the Police Consultative Committee and the statement made by Superintendent Nick Jupp regarding the appalling clear up rate for Croydon Police is to say the least misleading.
A question by a member of the panel regarding the Borough Commanders' Crime Report was asked, and they referred to the statistics that appeared in that report, not the Greater London Authority ones.
For the inspector to imply that the figures must be treated with caution poses the question why were they published by the police at all, as they were his police force's own pronouncements.
No matter who interprets the statistics, Croydon Police have not and are not serving this community as well as we wish.
Henrietta Pool
Kidderminster Road ..SUPL:
They are not likely to clear up any more either. . . . the only way you can clear up complaints is to INVESTIGATE them . . even if you take written evidence to them that proves the crime they still just brush it aside . . or worse lose the evidence for you so they can’t investigate it. . . then what they do is ignore your complaints . . . and worse have this scheme that stops it showing up as a COMPLAINT . .
They promise to look into your ‘grievance’, (shall we say) and call it a “Matter” . . then they ignore that too . . but of course they are only ignoring a Matter . . and not a complaint . . . . so it doesn’t show up on their books. . . . . . Here is what they do.
Let’s see if Mark Gores appointment will make a difference . . . Already the signs are not good . . . He has promised to keep up Vicki Marr’s “fantastic work”. . . . . Hhhmmm!
Hope you don’t mind me splashing your letter all over the NET Henrietta . . But I have so much more Web power than most others and am enjoying that privilege. . . No 1 on some searches is as good as it gets. . . . in time I might overtake their own site.
Colin Cole
Put simply Croydon Police offer to look into your ‘grievance’ as a “matter” . . they ask you to accept that and of course you do . . . . THEN they totally ignore it . . . by doing this they are not ignoring a complaint and it stays off their books. . . . and the best bit is . . . you agreed to it. . . what a great scheme eh?
The London Borough of Croydon have a similar scheme and it was explained to me by one of their employees. Only their scheme is far more devious.
See Croydon Council Dirty Tricks Page
Mark Gore will keep up Vicki Marr’s “fantastic work” . . . She’s “Tough on Crime and Tough on the Causes of Crime” no doubt. When her officers are not making up the TWAT Teams or doing Croydon Police Furniture Removal Scheme work. They are keeping the streets clear of “anti social” behaviour.
A 14 year old Go-ped rider has been given six penalty points .
Extract from the Croydon Advertiser 2/4/04 - A 14 year old Go-ped rider has been given six penalty points even though he's not old enough to hold a licence.
Police caught him riding the mini petrol driven scooter up and down Spa Hill, Upper Norwood. The Police stopped him while he was breaking the law by riding up and down the pavement on 4 September. Enquiries revealed that he was under age and did not have a valid driving licence or any insurance. On 22 March, he appeared before Croydon Youth Court and received a total of six penalty points for driving with no insurance whilst driving on a footpath. The Police said "they were pleased with the result. However there is still confusion as some shops are advertising these vehicles as not requiring any documentation or protective clothing, The law classes Go-peds as motor vehicles. Therefore people using them must be a minimum of 16 and have a driving licence, insurance and protective headgear. They should be driven with care and consideration to all road users. They are not for use on a pavement or any public footpath."
Well done the brave Officers of Croydon Met . . I will certainly sleep better tonight
. . . . Colin Cole
HOLD THAT PRESS . . . NEW IN TODAY 29th October,
A LETTER FROM GOD HIMSELF . . . DAVID WECHSLER CEO. . . so with KEVIN SEXTON Commander Croydon Fire Brigade that’s two out of three heads of Corporation . . .
YOUR TURN MARK GORE.
Mark Gore makes a good start in carrying on the tradition of the useless Vicki Marr and the incompetent Mark Stockford, Crime Manager . . NO REPLY TO THIS LETTER . . If they don’t like what you write to Croydon MET . .
They have a great scheme . . Just ignore it.
Which works fine unless you have 8 front page Google web sites to throw it back at them.
Disclaimer . . I don’t know how Croydon MET Police treat other people but this is how they have treated me. Everything is true with letters to back it up.
The sarcastic notes are based on those truths and are not meant to imply the Metpolice always act that way.
"for the removal of any doubt or confusion the author of these pages is married into a Jamaican family, has mixed race children and no racist inclinations whatsoever. The purpose of these pages is to point out the inadequacy of Police in enforcing racist legislation fairly, and according to the guidelines set out by the
1.3 The Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) define a racial incident as:
"Any incident in which it appears to the reporting or investigating officer that the complaint involves an element of racial motivation; or any incident which includes an allegation of racial motivation made by any person."
(nb the word ANY)
1.5 ACPO have set out basic standards for recording racial incidents and individual forces have produced detailed step-by-step guidance. In particular, the ACPO Policy Principles for Dealing with Racial Incidents state:
"There should be a presumption towards prosecution in all racially motivated incidents and the effectiveness of police response enhanced by promoting increased prosecutions, where evidence allows, thus demonstrating to perpetrators that their actions will not be tolerated."
ALL the above guidelines were totally ignored. . . . Not only that Croydon Police lost the evidence . . All four items properly and correctly entered into evidence along with my correctly sworn statements.
The point of these web sites is to point out that the same rules about racial hatred, racial threats, racial abuse, and even a racist gun threat . . that I had to suffer and endure. . . APPLY JUST AS MUCH TO THE BLACK CITIZENS AS THEY DO TO THE WHITES. And the Police are duty bound to abide by that and not just suit themselves.
Croydon Crime Manager Mark Stockford’s statement “This is not a matter for the Police” is not only UNTRUE but is UNLAWFUL.
Colin Cole
Mr Cole
Thursday, October 27, 2005
Borough Commander (To be)
Mark Gore
Croydon Police Station
71 Park Lane
Croydon
Surrey
CR9 1BP
Dear Sir Re 3838256/03
Who else can put a blank page at No 1 Google search?
Colin Cole & Ken Frost.
Croydon Ratepayers Against Croydon Council
http://www.cracc.co.uk goes straight in at No 1
Click here
COLIN IS BACK . . . My sites have fallen by the wayside for a year while I was being sued unsuccessfully in the High Court of Justice . . . . Not for Defamation or Lible; because every word in them is true. . . but for Harassment under the 1997 Act. . . Trouble is . . One of MCP clients had to PERJURE himselves to do it. With the assistance of MCP Law of course who had no right to be in the sameCourtroom , according to the rules, let alone prosecuting. There will be a tale to tell of Conspiracy to Defraud. Theft, Fraud, Conspiracy to Perjure, and just about every malpractice a Solicitor and Barrister can manage.
Please excuse the bad links you find. It’ll take months to restore these sites to their former No 1 in the World glory . . I’ll enjoy every minute of it.
The main reason this site was reinstated is not to have a go at dear old Sir Ian . . . He’s got enough criticism out there without mine. It was because it became impossible to re-launch all my sites individually . . . . They are so intricately entwined..
BESIDES . . . It’s about time The Police started doing their JOB . . .
ARRESTING CRIMINALS and PERJURERS and not making excuses NOT TO.
Colin’s NEW sites
Barnett Ross the no forms required to bid Auctioneers.
Contact Andrew
Mahon NI plaintiff 1’s chief fixer for details.
He knows Steven Grossman so doesn’t
have to fill out all those nasty Money Laundering forms.
Or ANY forms come to that.
www.barnett-ross.co.uk
www.barnettross.org.uk
(Andrew Mahon
3 Pettigo Rd, Kesh,
Co
Fermanagh, NI.
02868 632102
0775 665878)
Barnett Ross Auctioneers . . . We laugh at
money laundering regulations.
But will the police investigate?
What a STAR . . .
HARRY ROFFEY
In his Seventies and having a go at the HSBC and Kent Police. His site is
www.corruptpolice.co.uk/
He used to drive the BIG RED BUS. A really nice Guy until you upset him.
Bit like
me really.
See what I mean.
Click here